Saturday, November 8, 2008

FUCK YOU VERY MUCH THE FCC!

[a quote from Eric Idle's "The FCC Song"]

The Supreme Court has started hearing oral arguments in a case brought up by the FCC against Fox for Cher making fleeting expletives during a live program. A decision in favor would make it so anyone using "vulgar language" on the airwaves, and quite possibly any form of entertainment via extension (to be argued in future court cases), would create it so fines of $200,000 or more would stand against folks found guilty by the FCC of airing "vulgar language." To capitalist networks like Fox, this is a drop in the bucket. To community stations like KBOO, it would mean closure.

Of course, a decision in favor of the FCC would be a violation of the constitution, but that isn't anything unusual. The U.S. Government has been violating its own constitution since day one, especially when it gets in the way of capital. So, crack open another one for yet another violation of the U.S. constitution here in the alleged "Land of Freedom."

Supposedly this is over concern for children. Uhhh, yeah.

The most controversial words deal with human sexuality and excremental functions...you know...things that are natural for the human body. Having seen enough pussy, cock, shit, piss, and vomit as a CNA, I would have to say it really isn't that big of a deal as it is natural. Fucking, shitting, pissing, masturbating, making Love, pooping, peeing, etc., are all natural functions of the human form and have happened throughout time, as far as I know. George Bush shits, pisses, and at least in the past, has fucked. Sadly, look at the kids he's created. They, to the best of my understand, shit, piss, and fuck as well as drink and party heavily, just like their daddy did at that age.

Oddly, when there aren't any adults around, kids on any given school yard could be found cussing and saying shit to one another. They also say things like..."Fuck You!" when they are angry with one another. But, somehow, the FCC and folks like Supreme Court Justice John Roberts think that these words will somehow damage our children. HEY JOHN! WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN?

If you haven't noticed, this is not really a case that concerns the protection of children, it is a case to crush free speech. You see, in community stations like KBOO, free speech is often relagated to things not practiced in the major medias, mostly...telling the truth.

Example: Truth is, over 200 U.S. corporations funded both sides of the war during WWII, including Brown Brothers banking who had as an executive, Prescott Bush. Prescott Bush, W's grandaddy, was found guilty of selling Nazi War Bonds in 1942, while the war was taking place. There is also documentation that he directly benefitted from slave labor at Auschwitz. If the U.S. government FORCED these folks to stop funding both sides, a helluva lot more people would have survived. Instead, millionaires made millions off of both sides.

Turth is, shit like this still happens. And with community radio stations exposing such horrific behaviors on behalf of one of the most genocidal and human rights violating nations ever (the U.S.), would mean that you all might eventually rise up against the wealthy and make them stop their behaviors. That, of course, would mean the wealthy would have less wealth, so what they do is pay people to keep you all under control using violence or the fear of it.

A wealthy man visited Smedley Butler ("War is a Racket") once. He had $30,000,000. He told Smedley he would spend half of that to protect the other half. In other words, he would hire folks to use violence and the fear of violence in order to make sure his wealth was protected. [read: "The Plot to Seize the White House" by Jules Archer]. This is a common practice to this day.

So you see, this case really has nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with protecting wealth.
Does a nation that truly cares about children do this? This was done by the U.S. to an Iraqi child because her nation refused to hand over its wealth to the already wealthy who own the U.S. government. Do you really think this nation gives a rats ass about children? Fetuses, yes, children, no.

To the assholes that allege to care for children and support cases like the FCC vs. Fox and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, is this caring for children? Well, I'm sure she never heard the words fuck, shit, or piss, so she is really much better off being mutilated or murdered by the bombs you all profit off of.

How about the 50,000,000 children without health care in the U.S.? Well, there again, they ain't fetuses so who gives a fuck! Besides, if their parents were truly holy, they'd have money and be able to afford the privilege of health care. Besides, all kids are created by fucking, and fucking is evil, and therefore by extension, so are children. All children shit and piss, and therefore are evil. Fetuses for the most part, don't shit, piss, or get fucked by the local priest.

How about all the children leaving in contaminated sites such as those created by Monsanto?

How about the child slave labor trade?

How about the children getting raped by priests? Getting raped by friends or relatives in their own homes? We don't want them to hear the word "fuck," but the U.S. government sure doesn't give a shit if they get fucked by priests, relatives, or friends. Otherwise the U.S. government would do something about that. (Sorry, the funding for that program went into the $950,000,000,000 giveaway to the excessively wealthy and elite.)

You see, the U.S. government doesn't give a fuck about children. They give a fuck about free speech and the possibilities it has of exposing thier criminal behaviors. Community radio and TV stations often air such untold things as the truth and therefore may get in the way of the wealthy creating more wealth for themselves at the expense of everyone else, INCLUDING CHILDREN! ESPECIALLY CHILDREN!

So...

FUCK YOU FCC, SUPREME COURT, AND FOX! EAT MY SHIT MOTHER FUCKERS!